Monday, February 20, 2017

Vaccines: Dr. Wakefield

"Vaccines - Dr. Wakefield"

"Dr. Wakefield is a gastroenterologist. The so-called "study" was actually a paper, an observation, not a study. He observed 12 children at the request of several parents. These children, according to the parents, regressed immediately following the MMR vaccine. Dr. Wakefield, along with several co-authors, concluded that the MMR appeared to cause intestinal issues and may contribute to other autism like symptoms, however, "more research should be done." The paper was not retracted because of issues with the data, but rather because the funding was from a parent's group. In essences, it has never been "debunked." He was quickly attacked by associates of media mogul Rupert Murdoch who's son James happened to sit on the board of Merck. Wakefield never went to jail. He still practices medicine here in the US. His study has since been duplicated more than 2 dozen times and dozens of other studies have confirmed that there is a link. Professor John Walker-Smith, the co-author on Wakefield’s study won his appeal against the UK’s General Medical Council regulatory board. This board originally ruled against him and Dr. Andrew Wakefield for their roles in the 1998 Lancet MMR paper. The board admitted their original conclusions were based on “inadequate and superficial reasoning and in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion.” Wakefield is currently in the process of appealing the ruling against him as well. More info can be found here.

http://educationbeforevaccination.com/study/

Dr. Wakefield was the victim of a massive smear campaign. All for making a discovery that would have changed the world's perception on vaccines. If word got out that the MMR contributed to gastrointestinal issues seen in autism, the MMR program would fail overnight.

What many people don't realize is that Dr. Wakefield has had the continued support of his "fraudulent" test families since 1998. Wakefield's partner who published the paper with him has since been exonerated and Wakefield is in the process of being exonerated.

It's important to also mention the CDC Whistleblower and the intentional destruction of data data on their MMR vaccine studies. And also the famous "Danish study" in which no autism/vaccine link was found was done by Poul Thorsen and his co-authors. Poul Thorsen is a wanted fugitive for 13 counts of wire fraud and 9 counts of money laundering. A federal grand jury alleges that Thorsen stole over $1 million from autism research funding between February 2004 and June 2008. The study he published found no correlation between autism and vaccines. So who is the real fraud? Merck killed 40,000 people with their Vioxx lies. Any study put out by a pharmaceutical company cannot be trusted as it was designed, executed, and published by scientists who will make a profit off of that drug/vaccine. This is a HUGE conflict of interest. Merck is a BILLION dollar corporation. There is MUCH money to be lost if their vaccine programs fail.

It's also important to mention that Dr. Wakefield was NOT anti-vaccine and, in fact, his own children were fully vaccinated. He simply found a correlation with gastronintestinal issues, regressive autism, and the measles virus in the gut after MMR vaccination and he published a study on that with the recommendation that this issue be looked at more closely. And so began the massive smear campaign that would discredit him and ultimately land him in the USA. The vaccine industry was extremely successful in demonizing him in the eyes of the world at that time.

And since that time, many MANY children have suffered vaccine injury that ultimately led to their autism diagnosis. In fact, autism is a listed side effect in some of the vaccine inserts. The government's own vaccine court has ruled in a few cases that certain vaccines were responsible for the child's regression into autism. Perhaps the most famous of these cases was the Hannah Poling case: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/

And thousands of families around the world (and especially in the US) continue to claim that their child regressed within days of certain vaccines (usually the MMR or the Dtap). Why should we not believe them? Why is their assessment of their child any less valid than your assessment of your child? They have nothing to gain by making these claims and they are risking their reputation as a sane person, in fact!

Most of these families will never make it to vaccine court. Their concerns over their child's new symptoms are quickly dismissed as "coincidence" by their doctor. The symptoms are not documented fast enough. Many parents are told it's normal to have a high fever, clinched fists, screaming, and even seizures after vaccines. And therefore there is no evidence to hold up in court. Hannah Poling's parents won their fight because her father was a practicing neurologist and her mother an attorney and registered nurse. They were extremely educated on the science and the law.

Start by reading this: http://www.ebcala.org/areas-of-law/vaccine-law/co-author-of-lancet-mmr-autism-study-exonerated-on-all-charges-of-professional-misconduct

Then watch this movie - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkYGSGKI16Q

And here is a list of 25 studies from around the world which have confirmed Wakefield’s findings:

  1. The Journal of Pediatrics November 1999; 135(5):559-63
  2. The Journal of Pediatrics 2000; 138(3): 366-372
  3. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003; 23(6): 504-517
  4. Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005 
  5. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993; 7: 97-103
  6. Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 1-3
  7. Neuropsychobiology 2005; 51:77-85
  8. The Journal of Pediatrics May 2005;146(5):605-10
  9. Autism Insights 2009; 1: 1-11
  10. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology February 2009; 23(2): 95-98
  11. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2009:21(3): 148-161
  12. Journal of Child Neurology June 29, 2009; 000:1-6
  13. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders March 2009;39(3):405-13
  14. Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144 
  15. Journal of Child Neurology July 2000; ;15(7):429-35 and 1972;2:883–884 . 
  16. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia January-March 1971;1:48-62
  17. Journal of Pediatrics March 2001;138:366-372 .
  18. Molecular Psychiatry 2002;7:375-382 .
  19. American Journal of Gastroenterolgy April 2004;598-605 .
  20. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003;23:504-517 .
  21. Neuroimmunology April 2006;173(1-2):126-34 .
  22. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol. Psychiatry December 30 2006;30:1472-1477.
  23. Clinical Infectious Diseases September 1 2002;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16
  24. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004;70(11):6459-6465
  25. Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2005;54:987-991 "

Interview with Dr. W:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mT0VzAvfnb4

http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-01-15/dr-wakefield-talks-at-vaccine-safety-conference-autism-is-treatable/

http://image.thelancet.com/extras/statement20Feb2004web.pdf

http://www.rescuepost.com/files/autismfile_us33-wakefield.pdf

http://www.autismone.org/content/second-looking-case-dr-andrew-j-wakefield-william-long-mdiv-phd-jd

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id_AxZ3zHAc

http://www.naturalnews.com/035513_andrew_wakefield_vaccines_autism.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT-2S7L-N9c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6DuBR_xGQg&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Di6DuBR_xGQg&app=desktop

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/english-court-exonerates-mmrautism-doctor-uk-general-medical-given-sound-thrashing/

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2013/06/21/new-published-study-verifies-andrew-wakefields-research-on-autism-again-mmr-vaccine-causes-autism/

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058058

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/british-medical-journal-fraud/

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/4013-4-22-restore-lancet-paper-YazbakFE

http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/british-court-throws-out-conviction-of-autismvaccine-md-andrew-wakefields-co-author-completely-exonerated/

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Aromatherapy File

Aromatherapy File

Please do not edit this file. -admin team

Last updated: February 2017

Essential Oil Companies

Here we have compiled a list of companies recommended by aromatherapists and herbalists.

A few things to keep in mind when assessing an Essential Oil company:
  1. The U.S.A. does not have a governing body that certifies Essential Oils.
  2. There are no "grades" of Essential Oils. Example: There is no grade quality A, B, C, etc. Terms such as "Therapeutic Grade", "Certified Therapeutic Grade", "Pharmaceutical Grade", etc. are all Trademarked Phrases or Marketing Phrases. This means a company has set these standards themselves, this does not prove one oil company better than another. Terms like these can be used to differentiate Aromatherapy Essential Oils from the Essential Oils used in fragrance, flavoring or foods. You will want Aromatherapy quality oils which are unadulterated, high quality Essential Oils. 
  3. Ingestion -our group does not recommend ingesting oils in any form, as this is something to be taken with great caution while under the guidance of a Certified Aromatherapist, when and if the need arises: some companies are obligated to NOT recommend their Essential Oils for ingestion in order to protect themselves legally. Essential Oils are extremely potent, and should not be used internally without the supervision of a Certified Aromatherapist. If a company isn't claiming that their essential oils are "safe for ingestion", that does NOT necessarily reflect upon the quality of their oils.
  4. Organic Labelling: Becoming Certified Organic is a lengthy and very expensive process. Many companies are able to accomplish this, despite being smaller in nature. Keep in mind that the quality of a companies oils is not based upon whether or not all of their oils are labeled "Certified Organic". We encourage you to research any company you consider purchasing from.
  5. Quality & Certifications: the websites below should have information available -some upon request- about the process, testing and quality of their essential oils.

A-Z Company Listing


Apothecary Shoppe

Aromatics International

Aura Cacia

Eden Botanicals

Floracopia

Florihana -based in France, for US customers, choose the second link listed for affordable shipping.

Mountain Rose Herbs

Nature's Gift

Plant Therapy

Simple & Natural -website coming soon, currently listed on Etsy.

Stillpoint Aromatics

SunRose Aromatics

The Essential Oil Company

~~~~~~~~~~

Books

Butje, Andrea. The Heart of Aromatherapy: An Easy-to-Use Guide for Essential Oils



Lawless, Julie. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Essential Oils: The Complete Guide to the Use of Oils in Aromatherapy & Herbalism

Moldenauer, Leslie. Essential Oils safe use for the home

Price, Shirley. Aromatherapy Workbook: A Complete Guide to Understanding and Using Essential Oils

Purchon, Nerys & Cantele, Lora. The Complete Aromatherapy & Essential Oils Handbook for Everyday Wellness

Tissrand, Robert & Young, Rodney. Essential Oil Safety, Second Edition



Worwood, Valerie Ann. The Complete Book of Essential Oils & Aromatherapy, Revised & Expanded.

~~~~~~~~~~

Education


Aromahead, FREE Online Course: Introduction to Essential Oils

Aromatic Studies, FREE Online Course: Introduction to Aromatherapy

Real Essential Oil Education, FREE Course: Introduction

Tissrand Institute, FREE Course: How Essential Oils Work In The Body

~~~~~~~~~~

Groups

A few Facebook groups we recommend for safe essential oil use.

Animal Aromatherapy (Safe Use)

Blue Tansy Analysis: The Chemistry of Essential Oils

Essential Learning

Ethical Aromatherapy

I Love Aromatherapy

Real Aromatherapy Reviews & More 2.0

Real Essential Oil Education Group

~~~~~~~~~~

Resources/Organizations


Alliance of International Aromatherapists

NAHA (National Association of Holistic Aromatherapy)

Tissrand Institute

~~~~~~~~~~

Websites


AromaWeb

Aromaceuticals

Aromaconnection Blog

Barefoot Dragonfly Blog

Good Scents Company -select "Essential Oils" on the right hand side.

Lifeholistically Blog

~~~~~~~~~~

A Note About MLM Companies


Many of the recommendations that come from MLMs (Multi-Level Marketing) are unsafe due to the information being market driven and not based on research. Examples being: using oils undiluted,  taking oils internally without the guidance of a Certified Aromatherapist, using oils and oil blends on children that are not considered safe for children.

Claims of MLM brand oils being the "best", "purest", or "highest quality" are also marketing tactics. As stated in point #1 above, there is no governing body to certify oils in this way, so these statements are purely those from the company itself.

For these reasons, we do not recommend books, classes, or recipes from MLM companies.